Wagga Wagga’s operating cost per loan is $10.50; Cessnock’s is $14.51. A classmate says: “Cessnock costs $4.01 more per loan than Wagga Wagga, so Cessnock is less efficient.” What would have to be true for this conclusion to hold? Write one condition you would check first.
Of the 15 comparable councils in this band, Cessnock and Shoalhaven both report young-adult = 0, yet each reports more than three thousand junior members. Maitland, similar in size, reports 1,410 young-adult members. Give two possible explanations, and say which is more likely and why.
| Track | Your two answers | Your Week 7 kit |
|---|---|---|
| Independent | Both check a premise or explain a mechanism. A rough answer of the right kind is enough. | The rubric and the data. You draft every paragraph independently. |
| Scaffolded | Either takes the number straight off the table as the conclusion, e.g. “because $14.51 > $10.50” or “because young people don’t read”. | One guiding question per paragraph, plus optional sentence frames. You can re-sit the Gate mid-Week 7. |